Introduction

Too often, lawyers begin litigating without ever asking their clients or themselves the single question that most directly shapes strategy: “What is your goal with this case?” Whether you inherit a matter mid‑litigation or take it from the start, asking this question early aligns expectations, uncovers priorities, and often makes reaching the right outcome simpler and faster.

Why this question matters

  • Strategy depends on goals. A client seeking a public vindication will tolerate different risks and timelines than one prioritizing a quick financial recovery or preserving a business relationship.
  • Clients may want things you don’t expect. Monetary damages, an apology, non‑monetary injunctive relief, confidentiality, or simply closure — any of these will change how you evaluate offers, discovery, and trial readiness.
  • Efficiency and cost control. Clear goals prevent unnecessary motion practice, expansive discovery, and prolonged negotiation that don’t serve the client’s objectives.
  • Better client relationships. Asking shows you care about the client’s priorities, builds trust, and reduces post‑settlement dissatisfaction.

When to ask

  • At the first meaningful meeting or intake — before you set litigation milestones or invest heavily in discovery.
  • Again at key inflection points — after significant developments (e.g., dispositive rulings, new evidence, settlement offers).

How to ask (practical tips)

  • Be direct and conversational. A simple, “What would you like to achieve in this case?” opens discussion more effectively than legal jargon.
  • Normalize multiple goals. Clients often have more than one priority; invite them to rank or describe tradeoffs.
  • Ask follow‑ups that reveal why. “Why is that outcome important to you?” helps you assess risk tolerance and non‑monetary priorities.
  • Use scenarios. “If we could guarantee X but it would take longer/ cost more, would you accept that?” clarifies willingness to trade time, money, or certainty for outcome.
  • Document the answer. Put client goals in the file and re-confirm them in writing (engagement letter, intake summary, or email) so everyone stays aligned.

Sample client questions to use

  • “What would a successful result look like for you?”
  • “Are you seeking money, an apology, injunctive relief, or something else?”
  • “How important is speed versus maximizing recovery?”
  • “Would you accept a settlement that keeps this confidential but pays less?”
  • “Are there non‑legal consequences (reputation, business relationships) we should consider?”

How goals change the lawyer’s approach (examples)

  • Priority: quick settlement for cash — focus: early ADR, limited discovery, cost‑benefit analysis of offers.
  • Priority: public vindication — focus: preserving publicity, preparing for trial, refusing confidentiality.
  • Priority: ongoing business relationship — focus: negotiated resolution with non‑litigious terms and neutral language.
  • Priority: specific injunctive relief — focus: expedited discovery, emergency relief, technical experts.

Closing:  

“What is your goal with this case?” a standard part of your intake and of every strategy review. It saves time, improves outcomes, and prevents costly misalignment. Try it at your next client meeting — and document the answer.

Do not hesitate to reach out to our office at 415-341-1144 if you or your and your client would like to discuss your case.

Paul Nathan
Connect with me
Marin County California Divorce, Child Support and Custody Lawyer Representing Women Exclusively
Post A Comment